A Rating in Cybersecurity: 96 out of 100 on SecurityScorecard

What SecurityScorecard measures

The platform evaluates more than 12 million organizations worldwide based on public security signals, continuously, automatically and without intervention from the evaluated company. Its ratings are used by procurement departments, compliance teams and third-party risk managers to evaluate technology vendors.

According to the platform's own data, organizations with C, D or F ratings are 5.4 times more likely to suffer a security breach than those rated A or B.

The results

Nine of the ten categories have received the maximum score of 100: application security, IP reputation, DNS health, network security, endpoint security, information leakage, social engineering, threat forum exposure and Cubit score. The only category below maximum has been patching cadence, with a 95.

The last 30 days' history places Secyda consistently at level A, while the industry average remains around level B. The security status of the infrastructure can be consulted in real time at the Trust Center.

Why we publish it

When an institution evaluates trusting its communications and data to an external infrastructure, it needs to be able to verify how that infrastructure is protected without depending on the word of whoever operates it. "This rating is not a goal, it's a baseline," notes Pablo Bottero, founder of Secyda. "We publish it for the same reason we publish our sustainability metrics: what cannot be verified, doesn't count."

This result complements a security model that starts with the design of the infrastructure itself: complete European jurisdiction, without dependencies on third-country providers, 100% renewable energy with published metrics, and total institutional control over the operation.

The complete SecurityScorecard report is available upon request. Institutions interested in evaluating Secyda's infrastructure can do so at secyda.eu/contacto.